- Home
- Jonny Bairstow
A Clear Blue Sky
A Clear Blue Sky Read online
COPYRIGHT
HarperCollinsPublishers
1 London Bridge Street
London SE1 9GF
www.harpercollins.co.uk
First published by HarperCollinsPublishers 2017
FIRST EDITION
© Jonny Bairstow 2017
Cover design by Clare Ward © HarperCollinsPublishers 2017
Cover photograph © Adidas
A catalogue record of this book is available from the British Library
Jonny Bairstow asserts the moral right to be identified as the author of this work
All rights reserved under International and Pan-American Copyright Conventions. By payment of the required fees, you have been granted the nonexclusive, non-transferable right to access and read the text of this e-book on screen. No part of this text may be reproduced, transmitted, downloaded, decompiled, reverse engineered, or stored in or introduced into any information storage retrieval system, in any form or by any means, whether electronic or mechanical, now known or hereinafter invented, without the express written permission of HarperCollins e-books.
Find out about HarperCollins and the environment at
www.harpercollins.co.uk/green
Source ISBN: 9780008232672
Ebook Edition © October 2017 ISBN: 9780008232702
Version: 2017-09-14
DEDICATION
To Mum, Dad and Boo
(© Author’s collection)
(© Author’s collection)
CONTENTS
COVER
TITLE PAGE
COPYRIGHT
DEDICATION
PROLOGUE: EVERYTHING I’VE EVER STRIVED FOR, EVERYTHING I’VE EVER DONE
CHAPTER 1: THE VIEW FROM THE VERANDA
CHAPTER 2: I THINK YOU USED TO PLAY ALONGSIDE MY DAD
CHAPTER 3: THE PERFECT 10
CHAPTER 4: KEEP IT SIMPLE, STUPID
CHAPTER 5: THE KINGDOM BY THE SEA
CHAPTER 6: THE POP AND FIZZ OF CHAMPAGNE
CHAPTER 7: THE SMALLEST ROOM AT LORD’S
CHAPTER 8: ARE YOU HERE FOR ALL THE TESTS?
CHAPTER 9: TWO PHOTOGRAPHS, TWO ERAS
CHAPTER 10: A DAMP DAY IN FRONT OF THE WESTERN TERRACE
AFTERWORD: I AM BLUEY
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
ABOUT THE PUBLISHER
PROLOGUE
EVERYTHING I’VE EVER STRIVED FOR, EVERYTHING I’VE EVER DONE
Cape Town, 3 January 2016
I’ve been batting for more than three and a half hours. I’ve faced 160 balls. I’m on 99 – a nudge, a nick, a heartbeat away from my first Test century.
Just one more run …
This South African afternoon is heavy with a dry heat. The sky, shining without clouds, is as bright as the blue in a child’s paint box, and the glare makes everything around me seem profoundly sharper: the sweep of a full, noisy ground, the purple-grey outline of Table Mountain and the jaggedness of Devil’s Peak, and even the vivid emerald of the outfield. In my head I’m talking all the time. I’m reminding myself, as I always do, of the simple things that are so damned difficult to get right. Stay focused. Appear calm, almost nonchalant. Don’t let the bowlers get on top. And don’t, on any account, show a sign of apprehension.
Between deliveries I’ve occasionally drifted out of my crease and patted down or brushed away some imaginary speck of dirt simply because I wanted something to do, something to keep me busy and alert. Or I’ve occupied myself in other ways: twirling my bat in my hand, tugging at my shirt and readjusting my helmet. These small tics are displacement, each designed to banish the sort of thoughts that can gremlin the mind. When you’re so close to a hundred, it’s easy to lose concentration. Your mind can go slack, wandering off abstractedly. Then the hard, sweaty graft that’s gone before is undone in a nanosecond. So I have to stay in the moment. I mustn’t get ahead of myself. I can’t afford to think about the relief I’ll feel when this is over and gone, already part of my statistical record. I can’t afford to think about how handsome my name, illuminated on the scoreboard in big capital letters, will look with three figures beside it. And I can’t afford to think about what the century will mean, professionally as well as personally. Most of all, I mustn’t dwell on how I will feel or how I will celebrate in the middle. Or how my mum Janet and my sister Becky, who are sitting near the pavilion, will feel and celebrate too. Or how proud I will make them – this week of all weeks.
In two days’ time it will be the family’s black anniversary: the date of my dad’s death in 1998. How quickly that always seems to come around. We mark it only among ourselves, and we do so very quietly, remembering the best of him rather than the tragedy of that day. New Year creeps up like a forewarning, and we get ourselves ready for the anniversary in our different ways. They say that for sorrow there is no remedy except time. Every turn of the calendar puts more distance between us and the raw pain of the event, but even a couple of decades on it scarcely lessens the degree of it. A stab of that pain always comes back.
When my dad died, taking his own life, I was eight years old. Becky, who everyone knows as Boo, was seven. My mum had cancer, the first of two bouts of the disease that she’s fought and beaten. In that dark time – the worst imaginable – the three of us held tight to one another like survivors of a shipwreck. It was our only way to get through it. Our house, like our lives, seemed bare and empty and quiet, and our grief seemed inconsolable. We were hollowed out. But we had each other then – and we have each other still – and slowly we learnt to live without him. We came to accept his death, even though we don’t understand it now any more than we did then.
Everyone believes their family is special. Mine just is. It isn’t only about love. It’s also about understanding and trust, support and the empathy between us. Because of what happened, and the way in which we coped with it, the three of us are as close as it’s possible to be, our bond unbreakable.
I got a lot more genetically from my dad than my red hair. I got his eye for a ball. Early on I think he realised it or at least suspected that I could be a prodigy of sorts. Were he alive, or if he could come back to us for just one day – and how many occasions have I thought about that scenario? – I don’t think he’d be too surprised to discover that I’m playing for Yorkshire and England. I bet he’d just give a nod and a knowing smile and say he expected nothing less from me.
When I was the smallest of small boys, a mere lick of a thing, I liked to play pool. My dad and I were once in a pub in North Yorkshire, one of those olde worlde places with low black beams and horse brasses. He had his pint. I had my apple juice. I couldn’t have been more than six years old, possibly even a little younger. The two of us were at the table when a cycling club came in, wanting to play too. I have an inkling that there were five of them. My dad bet – a fiver, I think – that I could take on and whip the lot of them single-handed. The cyclists couldn’t have been more incredulous if my dad had claimed to own a dog that could sing and dance. I was so short that I had to stand on a stool to make a shot. They looked at him as though he’d already drunk several beers too many. They looked at me – a wide-eyed, freckled lad – and accepted the wager without hesitation, certain of some easy cash. I took each of them to the cleaners, much to their mounting stupefaction and my dad’s immense satisfaction. I know he wouldn’t have made the bet if he hadn’t thought I would win it; losing would have embarrassed both of us. So he must have thought his sporting streak was in me too.
If only I could ask him …
He taught me how to hold a cricket bat. ‘Pick it up like an axe,’ he’d say. ‘Grip it as though you’re about to chop wood.’ In knockabout games in our back garden, and especially on beaches as far flung as Barbados and Scarborough, he’d encour
age me to give the ball a good tonk for the sheer joy of it. I’d swing my spindle-thin arms at a delivery, trying to belt a huge six to impress him. I’d use one of his old bats – a V500 Slazenger – which he’d sawn down to my size. I kept that bat close to me, almost sleeping with it.
(© Author’s collection)
I’d tag along wherever he coached or turned out in charity matches, his first-class career already over by then. No question about it: my relationship with cricket began with my dad – and also because of him.
A lot of people, especially those who, like him, belong to the generation that grew up in the 1960s, still see me first and foremost as the son of my father. They always will, I guess. That’s because the man who was plain Dad to me, a pal to be trailed after everywhere, was to everyone else David Bairstow, the Yorkshire cricket legend: a wicketkeeper and, for a while, captain emblematic of the county’s traditions and passion for the game. Such public recognition meant there was no privacy in death for him, and consequently no privacy for us, either. Instead, there were front-page headlines, inky black and two inches high, a swarm of reporters and photographers standing at our gate, and television cameras at both his funeral and his memorial service.
Given the amount of publicity his death attracted, and bearing in mind the years that have passed, what I’m about to say seems impossible to believe but is perfectly true. Complete strangers, clearly fervent admirers with fond memories to share, will often come up and say to me casually, ‘So how’s your dad, then?’ Some will launch into an anecdote about him and finish it before I have the chance to tell them that he died a while back (I don’t usually elaborate about the details unless asked). Afterwards, they’ll mumble ‘sorry’ and look a little self-conscious, as if not knowing is something to be ashamed about, which emphatically it isn’t. Not for me. In reply I’ll say ‘no problem’ and sincerely mean it because my dad had clearly touched their lives, even if only fleetingly, and left them a memory cherishable enough to speak out loud. It’s proof, if I needed more of it, of how much he was admired.
How I wish he’d known that …
Others – and this may be even harder to believe – get confused and call me ‘David’, as though my dad’s career at Headingley, which properly started in 1970, and my own, which began there almost four decades later, are somehow one and the same. I’ve got used to this. I’ve been answering questions about my dad ever since I learnt to talk. When your surname is Bairstow and you play in Yorkshire at any level, it’s impossible to be anonymous – especially with a conspicuous mop of red hair.
At first my mum was a little wary about my ambition to become a cricketer. She was concerned in a protective way about the comparisons that she knew would be made straight away between my dad and me. About how I approached and played the game. About my character and his own. About how much I walked and spoke like him too. She worried that there’d be too much hassle and too much pressure placed on me because of it, but she kept all that to herself and never – not once – tried to steer me down a different path.
Since I knew comparisons were unavoidable, I prepared myself for them, even for the grumbling I expected to overhear at some point, such as ‘he’s not a patch on his old man, is he?’ or ‘his dad would have caught that’ or ‘his dad would have knocked that ball into next week’. My mum, who is so level-headed, has always said that ‘you can only be yourself … there’s no point in trying to be anything else’, a slice of practical philosophy that I’ve carried around with me. I’ve drawn so much strength from what she says and the example she constantly sets. ‘Extraordinary’ is too feebly weak a word to fully do her justice. I could say she’s one in a million, but the truth is that she’s rarer even than that – much rarer, in fact.
We live our lives forwards, but only understand them backwards. Everything usually takes a firm shape and makes sense only in retrospect. There are still stages in life when you gaze around and say to yourself: How did I get here? Today at Newland’s, on the brink of this hundred, is one of them for me. But the difference is I know.
I know how I jumped from school to club and then from club to Yorkshire’s academy. I know how I got from the second XI into the County Championship side. And I know how I became an England player.
I’ve always tried to honour my dad and what he did for Yorkshire, which for him frequently meant putting the county’s cause before his own. But my late boyhood, my early teens and then my adolescence were full of net sessions and practice drills he never witnessed, ups and downs he never knew about and matches he never saw. My mum was always there. So was Becky. Often, so were my maternal grandpa Colin, who took on the role of surrogate dad as well as his grandparent duties, and my grandma Joan. My grandpa died only seven months ago. I’m still grieving for him; something in me always will. We travelled en bloc, inseparable as a family. Reflecting on it all now, I know categorically that I wouldn’t have come close to a career in cricket without them. In particular I’ve got to where I am because of my mum and Becky. That’s why everything I’ve ever strived for – and everything I’ve achieved – has been done for them. I’ve wanted to look after them. I’ve wanted to repay them for their backing, their constant belief, even their gentle but persistent nagging of me sometimes.
Now I want to score this century for them too.
If I get it, there’ll be tears shed later on from each of us. We’ll look at one another, and shared memories of the past will make words superfluous.
Just one more run …
There’d be an odd irony about this century, a couple of small details that will make it seem as though everything about it was somehow preordained.
Perhaps so.
Batting is a tightrope walk, and it’s always the precarious next step that bothers you. At the crease, you’re secure only in the ball you’ve just faced. It’s gone and done with, and can’t get you out. But however well you’ve coped with it – you’ve picked the spin or read the late swing, you’ve pulled the bat away from something steeply rising or you’ve brilliantly clobbered a delivery on the up through extra cover – is then irrelevant. What matters is only the battle of the next ball. The nearer you get to a milestone score, especially a hundred, the more you can struggle. You have to handle the sense of anticipation in the crowd and also the expectation you begin to heap on yourself. The impulse to rush towards your hundred is perfectly natural and very human. There’s a desire to get there quickly, so the accomplishment is already behind you. You can end up doing something rash. Or you can find the process debilitating and a torture. Some batsmen call it The Demon on Your Shoulder. Others call it The Joker or The Grudge. You suffer a kind of paralysis because of it. I know that from experience.
I’ve been in the 90s once before for England. That was against South Africa too; at Lord’s, of all places, where to appear on the honours board is a kind of cricketing ennoblement. It was only my fourth Test. I’d made just 38 runs from four innings in the series against the West Indies at the start of the same summer. I was out of the side for the beginning of the series against South Africa to no one’s surprise – including my own, really.
You probably won’t remember why I found myself unexpectedly at Lord’s, facing a pace attack of Morne Morkel, Vernon Philander and Dale Steyn. It was because of what Wisden euphemistically called ‘textual impropriety’. Kevin Pietersen was dropped after allegations that he’d sent disparaging text messages about Andrew Strauss to some of the South African side during the Test at Headingley. It took some guts to axe KP; he’d scored a blazing 149 there, every stroke emphasising sublime, savage power. It also took some guts to bring me in as his replacement so quickly after I’d been dropped. The response, from commentators and critics alike, hovered between the sceptical and the scathing.
Against the West Indies, I’d had problems handling the short ball. The media saw me as a lame duck. The consensus was that the speed of Morkel, Philander and Steyn – fiercer collectively than anything I’d come across before
– would wreck me. I’d be sliced and diced every which way, they said. My technique was microscopically picked apart. My temperament was picked apart too, as though I was on a psychiatrist’s couch. The chief complaints against me – in no particular order – were:
That I wouldn’t cope with the bouncer.
That I wouldn’t cope with the occasion.
That I wouldn’t cope, full stop.
Morkel, it was prophesied, would be my bête noire. He’s nearly six-foot-six tall and he has such long arms. If he held them outstretched, he’d present a passable imitation of The Angel of the North. This means every delivery comes at you like something falling off a church steeple. Most batsmen wouldn’t relish facing him if he had a Granny Smith in his hand, let alone a shiny, hard-seamed Duke.
I’d got to know and like Morkel when he ever-so-briefly played for Yorkshire at the beginning of the 2008 season. My mum is the club’s Cricket Administrator and she liaises with the players, making sure those from overseas settle in. She cooked dinner for Morkel at our home and took care of him. He calls her ‘my Yorkshire mum’. Without the ball in his hand he’s a kindly, gentle man. With it, he’s more than a nuisance. Even in the nets, off a shortened run, he was fast enough to make most of his contemporaries look merely ‘nippy’.
In the swirl of controversy around KP, the build-up to the Test became weirdly askew; it was all about the man who wasn’t there. The furious saga about his mobile phone, what was or wasn’t said on it and whether the words constituted innocuous ‘banter’ or not, became a pitched battle. The claims and counter-claims and the accusations and denials swallowed up acres of newsprint and hours of TV, and provoked a blizzard of social-media comment, a lot of it X-rated. I was portrayed as an unfortunate sap, obliged to take on the impossible job of replacing one of the best batsmen on God’s earth. It was assumed I’d turn up, barely trouble the scorers and seldom be heard of again. Since I was expected to fail, the pressure on me wasn’t anything like the pressure on Strauss – about to play his hundredth and last Test – and England’s coach, Andy Flower, both of whom had demonstrated such a fabulous faith in my abilities, an act for which I’ll be eternally thankful. If I cocked up, the flak would be flying at them first and me second.